Buy Thir13en Ghosts Movie. Watch online or Download
Genres: ThrillerHorrorMyst
Starring: Shannon Elizabeth, Matthew Lillard, Jacob Rupp, F. Murray Abraham, Tony Shalhoub, Charles Andre, Embeth Davidtz
Director(s): Steve Beck
Available Quality: Hi Def
Country: USA, Canada
Year: 2001
Available Quality: DivX, Hi Def, iPod, Hi Def, Hi Def
IMDB Rating: 5.2 out of 10 (31291 votes)
Arthur and his two children, Kathy and Bobby, inherit his Uncle Cyruss estate a glass house that serves as a prison to 12 ghosts. When the family, accompanied by Bobbys Nanny and an attorney, enter the house they find themselves trapped inside an evil machine designed by the devil and powered by the dead to open the Eye of Hell. Aided by Dennis, a ghost hunter, and his rival Kalina, a ghost rights activist out to set the ghosts free, the group must do what they can to get out of the house alive.
 |
Thir13en Ghosts (iPod) | Resolution: 480x272 px | Total Size: 280 Mb |
|
|
 |
Thir13en Ghosts (Hi Def) | Resolution: 852x464 px | Total Size: 631 Mb |
|
|
 |
Thir13en Ghosts (Hi Def) | Resolution: 1920x1040 px | Total Size: 8125 Mb |
|
|
 |
Thir13en Ghosts (Hi Def) | Resolution: 1280x688 px | Total Size: 4475 Mb |
|
|
 |
Thir13en Ghosts (DivX) | Resolution: 640x352 px | Total Size: 706 Mb |
|
Movie Photos:
We have taken some photos of "Thir13en Ghosts". They represent actual movie quality.
Visitors Review
(24 May 2012)
Good movie
This is one of my fav movies. Matt Lillard is soooo hot! Why did he have to die? lol. I really love this movie, and some of the ghosts are really cool and creepy. I can watch this movie like 10 times a day! It is so great!
Michael O'Keefe (24 May 2012)
Mass confusion laced with terror.
I'm not so sure this is not all smoke and mirrors. Anyway we have ahackneyed story similar to the already overworked "House on Haunted Hill"concept. An egomaniacal rich collector has been collecting the unusual. Uponhis accidental death he wills his fortune and new glass home to his nephewand his family. After arriving at the unbelievable abode, they soon realizethey must deal with the warp-minded man's collection of ghosts. And they arenot very happy. Tony Shaloub is the nephew, and in my opinion is miscast asthe lead. Also in the cast are:F. Murray Abrams, Matthew Lillard and RahDigga. Scary...yes. Thrills with spills...yes. Darvocet headacheterror...yes. Great movie...well, let's try interesting.
thecollegebum (24 May 2012)
Not great, but not horrible.
I just rented this flick the other day, and I have to say that it's nowherenearly as bad as everyone says it is. I mean come on, this isn't supposedto be Shakespeare Âit's a B-movie. It's one of those mindless pieces ofeyecandy that's fun to watch on a lazy afternoon or evening. Sure it has hugeplot holes, but then again so do far better films such as Memento or evenCitizen Kane. I can think of far worse movies than 13 Ghosts. I only havetwo real complaints about this movie:1.) The Nanny: Why was she even in the damn thing to begin with?(SPOILER) She was so annoying that I was disappointed with the fact shesurvived. I was waiting for The Hammer to lay some smack down. (ENDSPOILER)2.) The Ghosts: Even with the brief glances we get at these characters,wecan tell that there's some sort of back-story to each of them. In facttheywere publicly released on the Internet before the movie came out. Whydidn't they include them in the film? I wanted to know more about theghosts. They didn't have to spell out each one's history, but we couldhaveused little scenarios like the beginning to introduce the Juggernaut or thebathroom sequence with the Angry Princess. And what the hell happened tothe Torso? We get one real glance at him in the basement, and he vanishes.I feel that the Torso had the potential to be one of the scarier ghostsÂcan't you imagine something like that stalking around the basement in thedark? Creepy. . .In the end, this film is worth a $1.99, 5-day rentals, just don't try tomake it into something it isn't. You want scary and tense? Try TheOthers.
(23 May 2012)
Whoa
Okay, so the woman with the slashed breasts was a little hokey but the rest of the movie freaked me out. I am an avid horror movie fan and although I am not much for slasher films, I do like the scare factor in a movie and this was rated right up there for me. Even if you are sceptical, it is worth a rent for sure.
(19 May 2012)
I'm the Thir13enth Ghost
I thought the movie was wonderful! I loved the Angry Princess-The Jackel- The Juggernot (however you spell it)-Hammer-and the Mother. The overall movie was just... WOW!!!! So go rent or buy the movie. I saw this movie a week before I turned thirteen! ... eventhough the movie is rated R it actually isn't that scary. Just some "language"...=)
(19 May 2012)
YAWN
Im sorry but I have to say that this movie, may just be the worst movie ever made. Okay maybe not the worst movie but still an extremly boring one. Honestly, I feel asleep for 5 minutes while waching this movie. Good actors is the only thing this movie has going for it. The actual acting isn't as good. But anyways thirteen ghosts is based on an uncle who is willing to let his brother and his kids live at his house filled with ghosts whom he is studying. It's based on a movie made a while back (can't remember what year) but that movie was supposedly a good movie (I've never seen it.) For most of my friends this movie did alot for them. But this movie did absolutley nothing for me - didnt scare, didnt have anything new or exciting. Maybe the old movie was better but the antics in this movie just bored me. Id rather watch a Paul Walker movie, yes you heard me right Paul Walker - one of the worst actors I've ever seen.If you want to laugh at supposed to be scary parts wondering if that part was supoosed to be scary, and if you want to fall asleep at the sametime then this is your movie. But If you wanna watch something thats actually scary try The Sixth Sense, The Excorsist, Hannibal, Silence Of The Lambs or The Ring
(12 May 2012)
Good at least for what it was. Underrated.
The plot of this movie and many of the plot elements in it are pretty much patently absurd, although this doesn't make the movie totally horrible. Often movies get a horrible review because they have a thin plot and aren't 'good' in essence.The idea is that the family moves into this house and there are ghosts in it, etc.... The igniting event that sets off the whole plot never really made any sense to me, but past that it's pretty clever. The only fundamental flaws with this movie(implausiblity aside) are that they never really explain how or why the ghosts get released, and secondly, they never explain how the device in the guy's house works and what it's for.Either way, it's a fun movie to watch.
lgilbertom (12 May 2012)
Good star, but the end sucks
Spoilers -----When i saw this movie a few days ago (2 May), i think that the movie has agood star. The first scene, is when Cyrus Kriticus try to hunt a ghost andis well succeed but with some casualties. In the beginning, lets clear thatCyrus is collecting ghosts for some kind of machine (which the purpose isunknown). There is a cut and the new scene star with a Arthur's family. Inthese scenes, is clear that Arthur was devastating with the lost of hiswife, but start to recover this.Until this point the movie working good, but when Arthur and his familygoing to Cyrus house (Arthur is Cyrus's nephew) all movie became amess.Exactly as a other comment said the two kids are there for one single reasonbring some problems to Arthur (In other words: THIS SITUATION AGAIN?). Thereare only two things that save this movie of the complete failure: theperformances of Tony Shaloub (as Arthur) and Mathew Lillard that try to dothe best with these limited characters (ok F. Murray Abrahams don'tcompromise in the role of Cyrus). The situations don't work well, arenonsense and predictable. All this, is culminated with "The End" very weak.Spoilers ---------Tony Shaloub and Mathew Lillard could choose better films, also i believethat this movie could have a good development with some effort. This filmcould be a good movie but predictable scenes and very weak "The End"downfall any hope.My vote is 5.
Lee Eisenberg (09 May 2012)
Where "ghost" thou?
"Thir13en Ghosts" does have a certain charm, if only for its silliness.Maybe there's nothing particularly special about a visual effects-ladenmovie in which a family inherits a haunted house, but the moviedefinitely has its moments, namely when the lawyer "splits". TonyShalhoub, Embeth Davidtz, Matthew Lillard, Shannon Elizabeth, AlecRoberts, Rah Digga and F. Murray Abraham are all able to turn in neatperformances, even if the whole movie is pretty outlandish. I wouldrecommend the original version more, but this one isn't bad. Perhapsits little more than a way to pass time, but a cool one at that.Acceptable for what it is.
(09 May 2012)
This is what I DON'T want to see in a haunted house flick.
I actually had somewhat expectations for Thirteen Ghosts, considering it was from the same production team that gave us the House on Haunted Hill remake, a mindless, but enjoyable scary thrill ride. Unfortunately, Thirteen Ghosts is mostly mindless, with a handful of good moments here and there, but hardly enough to make this worthwhil to even horror buffs.Tony Shalhoub stars as a teacher whose wife was killed in a fire that burned down their house. Shalhoub and his two kids are in financial troube, but their problems seem to be solved when Shalhoub's late uncle (F. Murray Abraham, proving furhter that he's not nearly as good an actor as his Oscar might indicate) will his house to his niece. Unlukcy enough for Shalhoub and his family, the entire place locks up and it turns out twelve ghosts inhabit the place and are looking to cause some death and destruction.Thirteen Ghosts is mess, thanks to Steve Beck's hyperkinetic direction. In true MTV-style, Beck flashes several frames per second, making this an assault on the senses that's even more unbearable than Stigmata. I don't understand, does Beck actually believe these quick cuts will generate scares? Does he believe he's made a truly frightening film because of this style? If he does, I feel sorry for the guy because all he's accomplished is creating doldrums. Yes, Thirteen Ghosts commits the cardinal sin of a Hollywood thrill ride: it's boring.Why is this? Aside from the direction, it's pretty obvious who's expendable and who isn't. You know Shalhoub and his family are going to make it through more or less unscathed, which is too bad because I would have liked to have seen Shannon Elizabeth in a gruesome death scene. Faring the best of the cast is Matthew Lillard, who's always amusing, and actually kind of likeable here.As I said before, there are a few good points. A couple of death scenes are fairly memorable and some of the ghosts' physical appearances are appropriately ghastly. The production design is actually fairly impressive, but not my cup of tea. The idea of glass walls that make up a house might interest some, but I prefer a good old-fashioned mansion for a haunted abode.It'd be a bit pointless to mention how brainless the movie is (they remove glass at one point for protection from the ghosts) why not just remove more and more glass until they reach outside?) or how goofy the plot twists are (I bet you'd never expect the ending would be taken straight from, gag, Casper!). I've come to expect such silliness from these films, but certainly, the trashiness factor didn't hurt House on Haunted Hill because it was enjoyable from beginning to end (and really, it was good trash). Thirteen Ghosts is just silly and dull, never a good combination.
Lauren (06 May 2012)
This movie lacks effort, plot, and excitement.
The overall plot is a tired one that we have seen many times. A familygets a big inheritance from a dead relative and moves into the creepyrelatives house. However, the plot has a twist in that the ghosts areactually a collection of spirits that Cyrus(dead relative) was going touse to power a giant machine from hell. WHAT THE HECK IS THAT ABOUT?seriously, this movie made me want a full refund in the theater of notonly my money, but the two hours of my life I wasted watching it. Howmany times are we going to see scary ghosts, in the haunted house ofdead uncle Cyrus, terrorizing the poor innocent relatives. Honestly, Icould have made a better movie. The only reason I gave it a two wasbecause there are a few jokes in the movie that I enjoyed. (namely whenthe lawyer gets cut in two and the babysitter says something like,"where'd the lawyer split off to?" Unless you like tired plots, boringlags in dialog, and a stupid ending, don't watch this movie.
(06 May 2012)
What A Waste of Time and Talent.
This movie is sure to be one of Tony Shaloub's 'I wish I had said no" movies. I only saw it because I really like the guy, and I am a minor fan of the original movie. To say I was disappointed is a major understatement. Its like saying this is simply a very bad movie. It is nothing more than a shockfest, and the filming is done so ineptly that you can't even really be shocked by what your seeing. There isn't enough time. It jerks around from scene to scene, real time to, I suppose, ghost time; blood (lots and lots of blood) and guts to pristine glass. Maybe there was supposed to be some sort of story within the story, but I already saw the original and knew what potential was there for a really good, fun, cool movie. What I found really disappointing was the characters, that of the ghosts and of the "living" people. In the original, you almost feel sorry for these lost souls that are trapped in the house. These ghosts were just gory cartoonish objects that you felt nothing for. The main characters?.... you simply didn't care what happens to them. To be honest, I didn't even watch the whole thing. It gave me a headache.
Erin (06 May 2012)
blood, guts, and a horrible ending - semi spoilers
13 Ghosts is definitely a movie for those of you who like the cheesy horrorslasher genre. The ghosts themselves are beyond awesome, the house isamazing in design and function, and the few death scenes areextraordinarilyvivid and grotesque (to my delight). The acting is also fairly decent foramovie of this type. Matthew Lillard stands out with a character that,despite having his trademark goofy voice, is rather endearing. I'drecommend this movie for the special effects alone. I have threecomplaintsabout the movie, however. Number 1 - for a slasher movie, not enoughpeople die. In my opinion, when more people survive than die, it is not atrue horror film. Number two - Shannon Elizabeth is stupid and she doesn'tdie!!! Number 3 - the last half an hour of the movie completely devaluedthe first hour and a half. In short, the ending sucked. So I'd recommendyou rent this movie, watch it up until the stupid part where Lillard andtheWINGS dude are absurdly carrying around a wall from one of the rooms, andthen turn the movie off. Because it all goes downhill from there. It'snota bad horror flick, but it could have been a pretty good one had theproducers not spent all the money on special effects and let the plotlag.
Jakemu Raine (06 May 2012)
Gory, Fun, Scary, Exciting, Terrifying--all great!
Its the season for Dark Castle Films to release a good, amazing horror movieto scare all of us, and they succeeded in my books by far. This movie has athe gore for all you gorehounds, all the laughs for a horror-comedy, and theright formula to be a Saturday night out to the movies. The first time I sawthis movie, it was on the computer, and just last night, I saw it on DVDwith surround sound and it was awesome. Thir13en Ghosts is a great movie foranyone over 11. My Take: 8/10My MPAA rating: R for strong terror violence/gore, language, and somenudity.
Gordon (04 May 2012)
Wait - weren't there actually F15teen ghosts?????
This movie was pretty bad. It starts off with a really noise and busyscene in a scrap yard where a bunch of people get killed by amean-spirited ghost. Then we meet an annoying family who inherit ahouse that is actually a "machine built by the devil, and powered byghosts". Of course the kids don't listen and wander off, and morepeople get killed (rather gruesomely, although I have the admit thelawyer getting sliced in half was rather ingenious), until the spunkyAfrican-American housekeeper/nanny/comic relief saves the day byscratching some records.But there was some rambling legend about needing 12 ghosts, and then a13th ghost to open up some Devil Eye or something...now, there were 12ghosts in the house...then the lawyer gets killed...then Shaggy...andthen Benedict Arnold-ish soul saver chick...so shouldn't there havebeen 15 ghosts wandering around?? I must admit the set (the movingglass house) was pretty cool. But the best part of the movie is theopening credits, where the camera pans 360 degrees around a room, whiletime passes and the room changes, without any visible edits. Thedirector deserves better.
sidereus_lyric (04 May 2012)
Wow! What an enormous waste of time!
I got really bored today and this movie was on. Having never seen itbefore, I cautiously tuned in.This was a horrible movie and I have a horrible headache after watchingit. Nothing about it is engaging, frightening or suspenseful. Everysingle word of spoken dialog sounds like someone repeating cue cards. It was my impression that after the fire that killed his wife, Arthurand his family were poor, barely making ends meet. How is it they havea nanny? And why? Is the daughter not old enough to keep an eye on thatbratty son? Isn't he a teacher? Doesn't that kid go to school? Whywouldn't Arthur be back to watch him seeing that he generally would getout of school at the same time? You see, we haven't even gotten to theghosts yet and already i'm rolling my eyes. The "nanny" is your typical token minority. "She's sassy!" No, she'sboring and unnecessary and had nothing to do with the rest of thestory.Anyhow (sigh), they inherit this weird house from an equally weirdrelative, upon checking it out, there's gears and glass everywhere. Noone seems to think there's anything strange about this. All hell breaksloose when the ghosts are set free, and start to come after the living.Honestly, they're grotesque, but not the least bit scary...nothing theydid shocked or frightened me. Unfortunately this type of mediocrity iswhat makes up the entire movie. I can't even blame the actors, it's thefault of bad writing and even worse directing.What throws me off is that a good chunk of the actors have all been inGREAT movies and have the ability to morph into a role when properlyled. F. Murray Abraham (Amadeus), Tony Shalhoub (Men in Black, Monk), EmbethDavidtz (Army of Darkness, Fracture), Matthew Lillard (SLC Punk,Scream), Shannon Elizabeth (Tomcats (yes even THAT was better than thismovie)). It's like decades of wasted talent! This is an utter waste of time with no redemption what so ever. Youwant to see a scary movie that will really disturb you? Try "The HillsHave Eyes", or "Silent Hill". I give this a "2" because of my respectfor these actors and seeing them in much better roles, and because ofthe make up and prosthetics done on the ghosts which actually lookedreal (not scary, just real).
Big-J-Q (03 May 2012)
For fans of B-horror movies
I watched this movie last night, and I thought it was entertaining.Sure, it's a B-movie and has its flaws - it's a bit silly, it's notparticularly horrifying (although I must admit no movie has scared mein 10-15 years, and I've watched quite a lot of horror flicks), it's atad silly (Ghostbusters meets Buffy the Vampire Slayer?). But asB-horror movies go, this one is entertaining for those who like filmswith supernatural phenomena and people dying in "imaginative" ways.Actually, Thir13en Ghosts reminded me of one of my favourite films, TheCube. But that's just the reason I can't give a lot of points for thismovie - there are better B-movies with which to entertain yourself.Cube-films sum up the better parts of the film and dispense with boringlove-issues. But then again, there are heck of a lot more crappierfilms than this, and it was funny enough for me to even buy it for fiveor so euros in case I came across this in a store.
hoobastankdude (02 May 2012)
13 reasons to see Thir13en Ghosts
1: Great makeup and special effects. 2: nudity. 3: matthew lillard is init[who gives a kick-ass performance]. 4: The Jackal is one of the creepiestghosts to ever grace the screen. 5: The house is cool looking 6: matthewlillard's lines [eg. "I hate it when they do that! they wait for you togetyour face right up against the glass and then they give you a BOO!", "Iguarantee nothing", "Did I just say there was a petting zoo down there?Nooo! There are ghosts down there", "I'm glad i'm not afraid of death,causethat would really suck", "well, i can [see something in these glasses] andithink we should go THIS way. now!", and "A truck full of blood? You gottabes***tin me!"]7: The Hammer is the second creepiest ghost to grace the screen. 8: thefateof Cyrus Kritikos. 9: the fate of the lawyer. 10: if you watch it at nightduring a thunderstorm in complete darkness, you won't be uncreeped forweeks. 11: the fate of dennis radkin [which i only liked cuz it soundedcooland the blood coming out of his mouth looked cool].12: The beginningsequence with the Juggernaut. 13: the movie kicks ass.People who don't like this movie obviously have no brains. How can you notlike it?!!! This is the greatest horror movie of all time!!! And peoplewhosay "Oh, the older one was better! it wasn't based on special effects andblood." well, the 2 different 13 Ghosts are in different genres. the fistone was kinda thriller ness [for 1960]. the 2001 version is pure horror.so,in conclusion, this is the best horror movie ever. and in conclusion. ifyouask if you won't be creeped after seeing it, i'll just say "I guaranteenothing."
stevenleadbetter (01 May 2012)
Death of the Bakers Dozen
It's been a fairly good second part of the year for horror movies. JeepersCreepers was very entertaining if lacking something in plot, second part ofthe year for horror movies. Not brilliant or outstanding by any means, butdefinitely fairly good. I was expecting a good deal from this offering. Itis difficult to throw a decent plot into the mix of stunning and frighteningvisuals. The plot here is simplistic and doesn't overshadow the point of thefilm which is, obviously, to make you jump. More graphic and lessatmospheric than Jeepers Creepers, it fails to make you feel for thecharacters, with the exception of Cyrus, the mad-scientist-cum-evil-uncle-cumpotential master of the universe. It has a happy ending which s out ofcharacter for fright movies at the moment. On the whole, rippingly goodstuff. Not as disturbing as ÂThe Cell' or as gory as ÂHellraiser', but acombination of the two.
(30 April 2012)
What a House
Arthur Kriticos is left to raise his two kids after his wife is killed in a fire. Being down on his luck he is suddenly visited by a lawyer informing him of a luxury home his has just inhered from an uncle. Arthur and his family move into their new home and discover that it contains an elaborate system of moving glass walls that have spells engraved on them to keep the ghosts trapped inside. The ghost can only be seen through special glasses and are soon loose within the house. The Kriticos family tries to escape but find themselves trapped and soon discover the house's secret.The movie is a remake of William Castle's 1960 version.The makeup of the ghost is good and the effects of the house are fantastic.
Review total: 20, showing from 1 to 20